Department of Physics, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan 60800, Pakistan
† Corresponding author. E-mail:
bukhari.hamad@gmail.com
1. IntroductionMagnetoelectric multiferroic compounds are a subject of significant consideration because they are characterized simultaneously by different magnetic and electric ferroic orders that are coupled. The magnetoelectric effect resulting from such strong coupling is stemming for exceptional materials, which opens a new horizon for the next generation applications in functional devices. In recent years, the magnetically frustrated multiferroic RMn2O5 family of oxides have attracted a great deal of attention due to the strong coupling between the magnetic and electric ferroic orders. [1, 2] The magnetoelectric effect revealed in RMn2O5 is due to a variety of phenomena, among them are magnetically induced polarization (
) in HoMn2O5, [1] magnetically reduced
in ErMn2O5, [1] magnetically flipped
in TbMn2O5 [2] and GdMn2O5, [3] and magnetically flopped
in TmMn2O5 [4] and YbMn2O5, [5] all arising in the low temperature phase. A reversible magnetocaloric effect has also been observed in HoMn2O5. [6] Moreover, the magnetoelectric coupling effect has also been studied in thin films. [7–9]
The main structure of all manganese RMn2O5 compounds crystallizes in the isostructural orthorhombic symmetry with space group Pbam. [10, 11] All members of RMn2O5 are characterized as the geometrically frustrated system because a slight deviation from their mean structure has been detected. [12] In a unit cell, there exist two manganese ions with different valances and positions: 4h for Mn
(t
e
) forming Mn
O5 square pyramids and 4f for Mn
(t
e
) with corner sharing Mn
O6 octahedra. These manganese ions together with oxygen coordination form a loop of five Mn ions, three Mn
and two Mn
. In each loop, there are three inequivalent magnetic superexchange interactions in the ab plane between the Mn
and Mn
ions, which are usually referred to as magnetic interactions J
3, J
4, and J
5. The J
3 and J
4 magnetic interactions correspond to the exchange interactions between the magnetic moments of Mn
and Mn
, and J
5 corresponds to the magnetic interaction between two Mn
magnetic moments. Considering the ac plane, one can easily outline two Mn
–Mn
magnetic interactions, namely, J
1 and J
2. The J
1 is responsible for the magnetic interaction between adjacent Mn
spins through oxygen at the
layer and depends on the radius of the
ion, which directly affects the z component (k
z
) of the propagation vector (
). [13, 14] Blake et al. have studied the crystal and magnetic structures of RMn2O5 (
, Ho, Dy) as a function of temperature by using neutron diffraction. They found that the spin arrangement of Mn ions is identical within the
plane of the commensurate phase for each system. It was also suggested that a shift of the Mn
cations gives rise to a net polarization along the
axis due to the canted antiferroelectric structure. [15] Moreover, the radius of
is essentially insensitive in the ab plane, while it determines the exchange interaction with adjacent Mn
spins in the
plane.
The key issue in the family of RMn2O5 is to elucidate the influence of
on the magnetoelectric properties and its effect on the Mn magnetic ordering through J
1. It is important to note that RMn2O5 compounds with large size
(La and Pr) are not ferroelectrics. [16] Interestingly, compounds with small size
(Nd to Yb) all present a similar behavior, with the largest polarization in the commensurate (CM) phase, [2] except in the case of NdMn2O5. Very recently, it was observed that the multiferroic NdMn2O5 exhibiting the largest polarization along the b axis in the incommensurate (ICM) phase [17] differs from other RMn2O5. This makes NdMn2O5 an interesting compound to study because it lies between the nonferroelectric PrMn2O5 and ferroelectric SmMn2O5 and possesses a different magnetic origin for the ferroelectric polarization.
A spin–phonon interaction has been observed in the paramagnetic phase of RMn2O5 (
, Dy, and Bi) with the detection of Raman phonons [18] and infrared active phonons in DyMn2O5. [19] More interestingly, it was found that the phonon anomalies in the paramagnetic phase show a strong dependence on the
ions. [18] Very recently, we observed an anomalous behavior in the dielectric constant slightly above the Néel temperature in GdMn2O5 [20] and DyMn2O5. [21] In this regard, we are motivated to conduct temperature dependent dielectric measurements in the paramagnetic phase of NdMn2O5 to reveal the existence of a dielectric response at high temperature in this compound. As Nd
has a larger ionic size as compared to Gd
and Dy
, so we expect some interesting results that can shed light on the role of the
ion in the family of RMn2O5.
Here, we report on the dielectric properties of polycrystalline NdMn2O5 in the temperature range T = 2–60 K with applied magnetic field H = 0–12 T. Based on our results, we provide a comprehensive explanation about the magnetoelectric transition in the NdMn2O5 system and also construct the magnetoelectric phase diagram. In addition, we will emphasize on the role of the
ion in the paramagnetic phase.
2. Experimental setupA polycrystalline sample of NdMn2O5 was prepared by using the sol–gel method. [20, 22] X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurement was performed with a Rigaku powder x-ray diffractometer using Cu
radiation in the 2θ range from 20° to 80° by step scanning at 0.02° per step. The Rietveld refinement of the XRD pattern was performed by using the JANA2006 program. The pseudo-Voigt function was used to fit the diffraction peaks in the space group Pbam. The complex dielectric constant was measured in the temperature range T = 2–60 K with applied magnetic field H = 0–12 T at a frequency of 10 kHz by using a physical property measurement system (PPMS). For the dielectric measurements, the powder was pressed into a pellet of diameter 13 mm under the pressure of 30 kN by using the Paul-Otto Weber hydraulic press. The silver paste was used for forming a capacitor.
3. Results and discussionThe high quality single crystal of NdMn2O5 is difficult to grow by using the flux method. [23, 24] However, the polycrystalline NdMn2O5 has been synthesized by the chemical transport method under high oxygen pressure. [25] Here, we report the successful synthesis of polycrystalline NdMn2O5 by using the sol–gel method for the first time. Figure 1 presents the XRD pattern of polycrystalline NdMn2O5 at room temperature. The XRD pattern is analyzed by using the Rietveld refinement technique assuming an orthorhombic structure with Pbam space group (see inset of Fig. 1). A good agrement has been found between the refined and the observed XRD patterns as all XRD peaks are fitted, which indicates the single phase formation of the material and no trace of any impurity. The obtained unit cell parameters are
Å,
Å, and
Å, which are consistent with the previously reported values. [12]
The study of dielectric properties is an essential tool to identify the multiferroicity. Figure 2 shows the temperature variation of the dielectric constant during both heating and cooling with zero magnetic field. The dielectric constant increases sharply at
∼31 K, which is referred to as the Néel temperature. [17, 26] Just below
, there is a sharp peak indicating a small thermal effect as observed previously. [17, 26] This sharp peak at
K is attributed to the ferroelectric peak as observed in other RMn2O5. [27] It is worth mentioning that the thermal hysteresis of
indicates the first order phase transition similar to the other ferroelectric members. A slight change in the dielectric curve observed at
K may be associated with another weak dielectric anomaly.
If this anomalous behavior appeared as a sharp step, it might be attributed to excitation of electromagnons. [28, 29] Here, we suggest that the anomaly at
K may not be related to any electromagnon excitation, rather it is related to a slight change in the magnetic propagation vector. [17, 26] The most interesting finding is the observation of the low temperature anomaly at
∼4 K, which is attributed to the independent Nd
magnetic ordering as observed in other RMn2O5 (
Tb, [2] Gd, [20] Dy, [21] Er, [30] Tm, [31] and Yb [24]). Chattopadhyay et al. failed to observe the low temperature independent Nd
ordering in their dielectric measurements. [17, 26] However, we have clearly observed Nd
ordering in our dielectric measurements, which is consistent with the magnetic susceptibility and neutron diffraction measurements on NdMn2O5. [17, 26]
We have also measured the dielectric constant under a strong magnetic field in order to identify the magnetoelectric effect in NdMn2O5. Figure 3 demonstrates the variation in the dielectric constant under a magnetic field up to 12 T. Interestingly, the dielectric constant remains robust against the external magnetic field at the most prominent phase transitions (
,
, and T
X
), however the anomaly at
smoothly vanishes with increasing magnetic field. The anomaly at
shows an interesting magnetoelectric behavior and is quite similar to that observed for other members of the RMn2O5 family. [20, 21] Astonishingly, no magnetoelectric excitation is observed in the paramagnetic phase (above
) as observed in the case of GdMn2O5 [20] and DyMn2O5 [21] that gradually moves to higher temperature with increasing field. This reflects the role of the
ions in the paramagnetic phase of RMn2O5, which is an unusual result and the origin of this discrepancy will be discussed later.
3.1. Magnetoelectric phase diagramIn order to elucidate the magnetic field effect on NdMn2O5, we have constructed the magnetoelectric phase diagram, as shown in Fig. 4. The phase boundaries defined by
,
, and T
X
in the phase diagram remain robust under the external magnetic field. These phase boundaries correspond to the phase transitions PM/PE
ICM1/PE at
, ICM1/PE
ICM1/FE at
, and ICM1/FE
ICM2/FE at T
X
, respectively (we have used the conventions for different phases (i.e., ICM1, ICM2, PE, FE) from Ref. [17]). At the lowest temperatures (
K), an additional structure is seen due to an ordered state of the Nd
spins, which corresponds to another phase transition ICM2/FE
CM+ICM2/FE.
The phase diagram for H = 0 exhibits similar phase sequences as observed through neutron diffraction. [17] Therefore, we suggest that fundamental physics behind the different phases is the same as that in the NdMn2O5 phase diagram as described in Ref. [17]. Above 3 T, the CM+ICM2/FE phase becomes unstable and merges with ICM2/FE as the field increases up to 12 T. A possible explanation for this unstable phase may be a reorientation of the Nd
sublattice under the external magnetic field.
3.2. DiscussionThe behavior of the dielectric constant is in line with the previous magnetic susceptibility and the neutron diffraction experiments on NdMn2O5. [17] The dielectric constant above 10 K is quite similar to the previously observed value and has shown no significant magnetoelectric effect. In most RMn2O5, the magnetoelectric effect appears in the low temperature phase due to different
ions as observed here in the case of NdMn2O5. The magnetoelectric phase diagram clearly explains the magnetoelectric effect in the low temperature where the phase transition due to the Nd
sublattice smoothly vanishes with increasing field and merges with the well-defined ferroelectric phase. Further investigation on the field dependent polarization should be carried out in the low temperature phase.
Flores et al. have revealed the existence of phonon anomalies in the paramagnetic phase just above
for RMn2O5 (
, Eu, and Dy). They have found out that the phonon anomalies in the paramagnetic phase show strong dependencies with the ionic radii of the
ions. [18] Thus it reflects that the paramagnetic phase in RMn2O5 is also sensitive to the particular
ions as well as the low temperature phase. However, no detailed investigation has yet been made in the paramagnetic phase of RMn2O5. Recently, we have clearly observed a sizeable change in the dielectric anomaly in the paramagnetic phase (45–65 K) with strong field dependencies in GdMn2O5 [20] and DyMn2O5. [21] The absence of the dielectric anomaly in the paramagnetic phase (35–60 K) of NdMn2O5 is worth noticing and may be related to the bigger ion Nd
(2.076 Å) as compared to Gd
(1.056 Å). Two possible scenarios arise due to different ionic radii of
. First, the bigger ionic radius of Nd
shortening the bond length between adjacent Mn
–Mn
spins through oxygen at the Nd
layer directly affects the k
z
component of the propagation vector as described in Ref. [14]. This increases the J
1 exchange interaction, which differs appreciably from the one observed in RMn2O5 with small ionic radius. Secondly, there is also a sizable effect in the ab plane that increases the J
3 while it decreases the J
4 exchange interaction due to the bigger ionic radius of Nd
. [14] We assume that
plays a significant role even in the paramagnetic phase due to a different ionic radius that changes the bond length and thus affects the superexchange interactions.
Currently, we are unable to speculate further about this discrepancy that arises in the paramagnetic phase. A detailed investigation of neutron diffraction may help to explain the role of the
ions in the paramagnetic phase. Also, a study of spin-phonon coupling in NdMn2O5 through Raman and infrared active phonons with special emphasis in the paramagnetic phase would also be useful to confirm the role.